Some real data on Web 2.0 use

As part of the JISC funded ‘SPIRE’ project we ran a survey to try to discover which online services people were using and in what manner. We were interested to find out which services were popular and if they were being used for work, for study or socially / for fun. The SPIRE project was originally looking into the possibility of using peer-to-peer technologies in UK HE and FE for informal sharing but switched to a more Web 2.0 focus as it became clear that these types of services were already having an impact on the tertiary education sector. They also appear to be where most of the informal sharing and collaboration is currently taking place online.

The survey was advertised to the Department for Continuing Education’s online students and on the online courses marketing pages. We received circa 1400 responses which left us with a lot of data to analyse. I have processed this data in to a number of colorful charts which are in the PDF below.

I have already drawn a number of conclusions from these charts but have not included these thoughts in the PDF as I would be interested to know what others think the data might mean.

Results of the survey undertaken by the JISC funded SPIRE project (PDF)

For the full analysis of this data please download the final report here:
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/spiresurvey.pdf

40 thoughts on “Some real data on Web 2.0 use

  1. Pingback: OLDaily[中文版] » Blog Archive » 2007年3月16日

  2. Pingback: TALL blog » Blog Archive » Some real data on Web 2.0 use

  3. Pingback: jill/txt » statistics about web 2.0 usage patterns

  4. Pingback: Web 1.0 use and Web 2.0 contribution « Social Sim

  5. Pingback: The Future of Communities Blog » Blog Archive » Ratio of lurkers in web 2.0 communities

  6. I’ve just had a quick look at your results – some things I’ve found interesting (such as the fact that post-docs were the most likely to be using Wikipedia!)

    I do have a few questions – in particular about services that you’ve not listed. For example, you’d got YouTube but not Google Video (I’ve personally found that the educational range at Google is better, or at least easier to find), you’ve also got MySpace but not Live Journal (or Elgg).
    Did you give people the option to add extra systems – either for the categories you had (Social networking) or for others (e.g. Gliffy for creating diagrams?)

    It’s useful to have this data though, as I’ve found that I have to get most of the data about what people are using from Pew Internet & that’s US based.

  7. Pingback: TISCAR .:. Periodismo -:- Blogs -:- Educación » Usos reales de la web 2.0

  8. They are very interesting data, Dave. It would be really interesting to show the aggregated data for every service not filtered by age, because I think that this data point to a profile of very intensive Internet user that ran across all ranges of ages. In some way, you take the orientation of respondent towards technology when you mention in the report that “the majority of respondents probably had some interest in leaning online to have initially discovered the page.”

    And a second question, would it be possible to elaborate data on how many people use one, two, three, etc of these services?

    Really good work. Thank you for sharing

  9. Pingback: ¡Sois todos una pandilla de lurkers! « ConTexto

  10. Pingback: silentcolors.net » archivo » Eso de la Web 2.0

  11. Useless questions = useless answers, or nothing we couldn’t have predicted about present and future usage patterns through the age groups. Many different spellings of “calendar” suggest the authors were in such a rush to get this to press, they couldn’t be bothered with spell-checking or proof-reading. B-, must try harder.

  12. Pingback: Datos sobre el uso de la web 2.0 - Bio XD

  13. Pingback: Web 2.0 Use « Learn-Learn-Learn

  14. Interesting- I note that my age group is left out of the anaylses (65+), and in my experience such pre-boomers are very high users of web2 and the intenet as a whole..and the younger ggrouops *40-65) less so.. at least the latetr seesm to show up!

  15. Pingback: Tecnoetica » Cosa usano gli utenti del web 2.0?

  16. Pingback: TALL blog Some real data on Web 2.0 use « ICT Assessment - valid, or what?

  17. Pingback: Web 2.0 use in education at ICT Intent

  18. Thanks for this survey, it was very insightful. The growth of social networking over such a short period of time is really phenominal. I wonder when web 3.0 will start…

  19. Pingback: East Sussex ICT » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 use in education

  20. Pingback: La web social entra en la universidad « Esc. Adm. Pública Universidad de Valparaíso

  21. Pingback: Stats on Web 2.0 provide fodder for speculation « Change Is Good

  22. The site looks great ! Thanks for all your help ( past, present and future !)

  23. Pingback: » Quin ús se’n fa dels serveis Web 2.0?

  24. Pingback: TALL blog » Blog Archive » Isthmus update - 22 May

  25. Pingback: EduBlog Insights » Blog Archive » Second meeting at the high school

  26. Pingback: ICTlogy » A Reader on Education 2.0

  27. Pingback: AtapiStudio » Blog Archive » Eso de la Web 2.0

  28. I’ve been experimenting with various collaboration & document sharing tools and have discovered an excellent site. It is a very user friendly, web-based application that is well worth taking the time to explore. Take a few minutes and look at Projjex.com. The tutorials are excellent & you don’t need to be a Rocket Scientist to figure out how to use it. It even offers a free version so you can try it on for size.

  29. I would be really interested in seeing a copy of the final report but the link provided does not work. Please could you send me a copy as it may well support my dissertation.

  30. Pingback: Usos reales de la Web 2.0

  31. nteresting- I note that my age group is left out of the anaylses (65+), and in my experience such pre-boomers are very high users of web2 and the intenet as a whole..and the younger ggrouops *40-65) less so.. at least the latetr seesm to show up!

  32. Pingback: Eso de la Web 2.0

  33. Pingback: Web2.0 haben wir noch nicht genug geredet… « Bibliotan

Comments are closed.